Independent reference & toolkit 100 compounds graded · Last reviewed June 2026

Methodology · The Codex Scale

The Codex Scale.

One ten-point rubric, applied to every compound on the site. It reflects the strength and relevance of the evidence in humans — not how popular, promising, or widely sold something is. A compound can be everywhere and still grade poorly.

The Codex Scale · 1–10

Every one of 100 compounds graded the same way.

One ten-point scale, applied without exception — from 10 · Established down to 1 · Unsupported. Here's where the field actually sits today.

The ten tiers strongest to weakest

10Established

FDA-approved for this exact use, confirmed by large randomized trials and meta-analyses.

9Strong

Multiple large RCTs, widely replicated. Approved or in active phase-3.

8Good

RCTs with consistent results — some scale, duration, or population limits.

7Moderate

Multiple phase-2 trials, generally positive. Real human data, not yet definitive.

6Preliminary

Small or short RCTs — suggestive but not settled.

5Early

Pilot studies, open-label trials, or case series — early human signal only.

4Animal-leaning

Multiple animal models with some preliminary human signal.

3Animal only

Animal data only. May or may not translate to humans.

2Theoretical

Plausible mechanism, but no outcome data shows it does what is claimed.

1Unsupported

Marketing or anecdote only — nothing credible behind the claims.

Grouped, for filtering
A few principles

Educational content, not medical advice — a grade is never a recommendation to use a substance.